For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few basic triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to expand his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, forum.altaycoins.com sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' material on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the government's new AI plan, a national data library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, asteroidsathome.net firms in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, utahsyardsale.com however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector library.kemu.ac.ke over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain for how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.